One of the more obscure sources of information for family historians who are looking specifically at the 18th century, are hair powder certificates. William Pitt the Younger was responsible for a whole series of taxes at the end of the 18th century, including the first income tax, either directly or indirectly to help fund the expensive war with Napoleonic France. The introduction of a tax on hair powder was one such measure.
Individuals who used hair powder were required to purchase a certificate from their local Justice of the Peace for which they were charged one guinea. The list of those that had paid was lodged at the local Quarter Session court and a copy of the list affixed to the door of the parish church by the parish constable. It was common practice also, to fine those who did not pay this tax.
The information included in the list will provide a date, a parish, a list of names and a description being usually the relationship to the head of the household or another role such as servant. So, like a census return, it is possible to piece together some familial relationships.
The lists however will of course be much less complete than a census because most people were not of a status to wear wigs or hair powder and there were also many exemptions such as clergymen with an income of under £100 a year, non-commissioned officers, militia, mariners, officers in the navy below commander and many others. One payment was acceptable for a group of servants in one household.
Contrary to popular belief women did not wear wigs, but simply had the equivalent of today’s hair extensions added to their existing hair. Women mainly powdered their hair grey or blueish grey and from the 1770’s it was never bright white like men. Wig powder itself was made from finely ground starch to which was added lavender, jasmine, roses and scented with orange flower and was occasionally coloured violet, blue, pink or yellow, but was most often used as off-white.
In 1869 the Act was repealed as less than 1,000 people were by that time wearing wigs – maybe it was the cost of paying such a large amount of duty that led people to change their appearance. Certainly, a more natural hairstyle was adopted by fashionable young gentlemen in Regency England.
It is still possible today to find records around the country of hair powder certificates if you contact the relevant archives.
There were, of course exemptions from this tax.
We will finish with this extract from the Derby Mercury 21 September 1797
I have 2 original Hair Powder certificates, one from 1795 and 1 from 1796. Are they worth anything??
LikeLike
Unfortunately we really couldn’t comment as to their financial value you would need to ask someone who specializes in antiques. In terms of social history they are of immense value; so if they have limited financial value it might be worth giving them on loan to your local archives. Let us know how you get on as we and our readers would love to know. Hope this helps
LikeLike
Next summer, 2015, we are doing an exhibition called “Tithes, Taxes and Old Southam Town” and have a list of the persons who paid their wig tax in 1795 in Southam, Warwickshire. We would love to have permission to include some of your information in the exhibition under your name.
LikeLike
Permission granted with pleasure; how exciting, please let us know nearer the time and we’d be more than happy to help publicize the exhibition. 🙂
LikeLike
Thank you. I will be delighted to keep you informed.
Linda
LikeLike
Excellent, we look forward to hearing from you 🙂
LikeLike
Pingback: Frank Churchill Gets a Haircut | Sarah Emsley
Pingback: 古代奇稅:鬍鬚、窗戶、尿 - *CUP
Pingback: 150th anniversary of the repeal of the wig powder tax