Accidently digging up skeletons

Whilst researching something completely different about Chiswick, I came across this newspaper report and whilst I was unable to identify the family concerned, it would be interesting know the outcome.

London Packet and New Lloyd’s Evening Post, 8 February 1809

A few days since, the skeleton of a human body was discovered at Chiswick, in Middlesex, which has excited a very interesting inquiry in that neighbourhood. A new tenant taking possession of a farm, belonging to his Grace the Duke of Devonshire, in that parish, in stubbing up roots of some poplar trees, he discovered a skeleton, buried only 18 inches under them, with a fracture in the skull, and without any appearance of a coffin or other usual covering of interment.

Some causes of suspicion arsing amongst the principal inhabitants a Coroner’s Inquest was summoned before George Hodgson Esq. when the following singular circumstances appeared in evidence before them; that Mr B__, father of the late tenant of that farm dying about ten years ago, had bequeathed a considerable property jointly between his two sons, the one who succeeded to the business, and the other who was an idiot, and who lived with his elder brother for about a year after their father’s decease, and was then missed one night, said to have got out of the window, and his foot step traced towards the Thames, in which he was supposed to have been drowned.

The surviving brother, who succeeded his property, had the river dragged in search of his body and advertised a considerable reward for its discovery, but no tidings were heard of it whatever. It also came out in evidence  out in evidence, that the very morning on which the unfortunate man was missed, his brother has given particular directions to his carter not to come and load for Covent garden market, as had been his usual custom, and had also planted with his own hands the same day the poplar trees under which the skeleton has been found. The Coroner’s Inquest, after sitting several hours in deliberating on this strong circumstantial evidence, adjourned and have been assembled, but their verdict has not been declared. In the interim, however, the natural object of suspicion is said to have absconded.

This article made me wonder whether other skeletons had been discovered during that period  and was surprised by the number that were, especially given that it was usual practice to bury bodies at least six feet below ground, but of course it’s not clear how long the skeletons had been buried. These first two skeletons also appeared to have been accompanied by chains which I found a little curious.

Schiavonetti, Luigi|Blake, William; Skeleton Reanimated; John Rylands Research Institute and Library

London Courier and Evening Gazette, 12 August 1801

Thursday forenoon, upon turning up part of the floor, opposite to the pulpit of the Outer High Church, Glasgow (at present undergoing repair), a skeleton was discovered, and a gold chain, about a yard long, rolled around one of the legs.

 

The merits and defects of the dead by their ingenious secretary Ld. Yale Library

Porcupine, 21 September 1801

The skeleton of a very tall man was found five feet under the surface on the bank of Cowbit Wash (Lincolnshire), a few days ago, by some bankers who were repairing the bank near Peakhill. No marks of violence were discovered on the skull or bones, which have been collected and interred in Cowbit Churchyard. Near the same place, a brass measuring chain was found, 22 yards long, the links of which are about 16 inches in length.

This one from the Sun of 26 March 1802 is interesting, I wonder who the Constantia was. I took at look at the family tree but couldn’t see anyone by that name amongst them.

A few days since as some labourers were digging a trench at Ware Park, Hertfordshire, the seat of Thomas Hope Byde Esq, they found four stone coffins with a skeleton in each, one of which was a female whose teeth and hair were in a perfect state of preservation. There was a gold medal round her neck, with the name CONSTANTIA  written upon it, which is now in the possession of Mr Byde.

The following account from the True Briton, 9 June 1802 isn’t something I could imagine happening today:

A few days since, as some labourers were digging for the foundation of a windmill, on the Downs near Rottingdean, Sussex, they discovered a human skeleton which was doubtless of some ancient warrior, as his sword was laying parallel with his left thigh bone. The men, having no great veneration for antiquity, left the whole exposed whilst went to dinner, which afforded some one of  greatest curiosity, an opportunity of smuggling of the rare but rusty relic.

And another from the True Briton 1 July 1802

On Wednesday, at Sunderland, a human skeleton was found under the foundation of an old house in Stobb Lane; it is supposed the house has stood upwards of 60 years, and was lately pulled down, and a steam mill is now erecting thereon. The bones were entire, measuring upwards of six feet, and are supposed to have been the remains of some person murdered, as there are marks of violence discoverable on the skull.

Skeleton of a woman: anterior view. Line engraving by A. Bell after J.-J. Sue, 1798. Wellcome Library

Finally, we have yet another offering from True Briton 15 December 1802

The skeleton of a human body. Apparently of a female, was last week discovered in a ditch, in the parish of Broadwater, Sussex. Near the bones was found a small earthern plate.

9 thoughts on “Accidently digging up skeletons

  1. how fascinating! I conjecture that the man with the measuring chain was undertaking some surveying for some party and was either the victim of chance villains robbing him as he would not be quickly missed, or was killed by those who feared that surveying meant that their holdings would be diminished . Unless the soil is very acid, in which case the skeleton does not last long either, other than as a sand-shadow, but on average it takes around 4 months to reduce a body to a skeleton if left exposed, but 18 months or more if buried a couple of feet down. It might be possible to match the skeletons to missing persons, but given the uncertainties of time periods having passed, without modern forensics, it seems unlikely that their identities will ever be known.

    I conjecture that the four stone coffins may have belonged to a long lost and robbed out chantry, abandoned after the reformation, but there’s not enough to go on to make more than a speculative guess. Constantia may not have been her name, but a love-token from, or intended for, one who remained constant or for whom she remained constant. If pre-reformation, then the use of Latin would not be unusual.

    My modern mind screams about wanting proper investigations… but my son did train as an archaeologist!

    Like

    1. Sarahmurden

      I do think it was would brilliant if it were possible to do more research into each case, who knows where they would lead 🙂

      Like

      1. I would think the remarkably tall surveyor might yield some results… possibly with him being logged as an army deserter because it suddenly occurred to me that he could have been part of the Ordnance Survey, the first map was published in 1801, Kent and part of Essex, so moving on to survey Lincolnshire would be possible. I can imagine some frightened peasants thinking that a soldier was surveying them for reasons of greater taxation/harsh restrictions… or even that they came upon him drowned in a ditch after a drunken stumble, and buried him to avoid charges of murder. [and I try not to let my mind wander onto a plot bunny.]

        Like

        1. Sarahmurden

          Definitely entering plot bunny territory here 🙂 The article provides no clues as to how long the skeleton might have been there, but given the chain it does seems feasible he was a surveyor. The bones were reinterred in the churchyard, but I looked at the burials for that year in case any note had been made in the register, but nothing 😦

          Like

  2. pennyhampson2

    How intriguing! It would be amazing if modern day forensics could identify these. I wonder how many other skeletons are still awaiting discovery.

    Like

  3. Pingback: Loyalist Trails 2024-19 – UELAC

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.