
Georgian fashion dictated that women wore ‘big dresses’ accompanied by the even bigger hair so with all that fabric and ‘high hair’ fashion it should come as no surprise that accidents happened. With that in mind, we thought we would take a peek at the fires caused by the fashions of the day.

We had no idea that there were so many incidents reported in the newspapers about hair and fabric being set alight by the open fires and so many deaths resulting from these incidents, so here are just a few.

London Chronicle (London, England), September 28, 1776 – October 1, 1776
Edinburgh, Sept 25. We hear from Dundee, that a few days ago, as a young lady was writing, the candle set her head-dress on fire. It burnt some time before she was aware; the then wrapped a handkerchief round her head to smother the flame, but it also catched fire; it was, however, extinguished with having scorched the lady much; but the fright affected her so much that she died in two days. Her name was Wedderburn*, an amiable young lady and her death is deeply regretted.
St. James’s Chronicle or the British Evening Post (London, England), March 17, 1778 – March 19, 1778
Last week a very melancholy accident happened to Miss Vane, daughter of the Hon. Mr Vane of Bielby , in Yorkshire; being sitting by her fire she dropped her keys within the fender and, stooping to take them up her head-dress took fire, and she was burnt so dreadfully before it could be extinguished, that she expired in a few hours.

Public Advertiser (London, England), Monday, January 7, 1793
Lady Elizabeth Pratt is out of danger from her late unfortunate accident, which very deeply affected the venerable Earl, her father. Her Ladyship had her head scorched by her head-dress catching fire while she was reading.

Morning Chronicle and London Advertiser (London, England), Wednesday, July 8, 1778
An evening paper has the following whimsical article: amongst the many accidents which happened on Sunday evening last from the lightning, the following, however extraordinary, may be relied on as a fact. About half past nine, just as the thunderstorm began, three ladies took shelter under one of the trees in St James’s Park : One of their heads was erected to an enormous height, and consequently stuck full of long wire pins : unfortunately these acted as conductors, and set her head-dress on fire, by attracting the lighting. Her two companions screamed with horror, but so stupefied with fear and astonishment were all parties that not one had presence of mind to remove her from the shelter of the tree into the rain. In spite of every efforts made by those distressed ladies, the fire raged with great violence for above ten minutes, destroying in that time above eight yards of gauze, a small quantity of hair and a prodigious load of wool, powder and pomade. At last two young fellows, supposed by their being furnished with syringes, to be apothecary’s apprentices, seeing the fire from an adjacent tree, and apprehending it might set the whole park ablaze, sallied forth to the poor lady’s assistance, and levelling their syringes with infinite adroitness and success both before and behind in a little time happily extinguished it.
As soon as the storm abated, she was bought to a house in Spring Gardens, where our correspondent saw her. All her hair was burnt down to a black crumbling stubble and her face was singed with the flopping of the flames over it, that she cut a most shocking figure. It being intimated that she lived in Threadneedle Street, a coach was called, and she was conveyed home to her family. The writer of this article cannot dismiss it without earnestly requesting his fair countrymen would drop, at least for this summer, so dangerous a fashion as high heads.

Clearly as these instances of hair or clothing being set alight were not rare as a very a sensible couple advised their daughters to how to cope with such an event:-
Bath, March 1809.
A beautiful young lady, in a neighbouring city, was lately rescued from the most imminent danger of being burned to death. As the method of her preservation from this dreadfully calamitous situation might be successfully adopted in like cases, a minute detail of all the circumstances ought to be generally known. Her muslin dress, being touched by a candle; caught fire, and the flame instantly blazed above her head. Fortunately two of her sisters were in her chamber. One sister with a long and strong pair of scissors, blunt at both points, with great expedition and steady resolution, cut through all her clothes on the hind part of her neck all down her back; that is, through her gown, her stays in the space between two whalebones, her shift, and the bindings of her petticoats.
As one sister was thus employed, the other slit up the gown at the wrists; and then immediately, with a pair of tongs from the fender, took firm hold of the clothes on fire, upon the fore part of the neck, and pulled them forcibly forward and downward from the shoulders; when all the garments instantly dropped off upon the floor, and were thrown into the chimney in a blaze. The time between the commencement of the fire, and till the young lady was rescued from all danger, was less than two minutes.
The flame, had scorched her face and neck, so as to be very painful for some hours; but not even a blister had arisen. A delay of but a few minutes longer, would have occasioned incurable mischief; either death or deformity must have been the inevitable consequence.
It may be proper to explain how these measures of prevention were so promptly and successfully executed. All the sisters had previously received complete instructions from their parents in what method to proceed in such a dreadful emergency, if their muslin dress should catch fire. They had frequently consulted together how to act in the moment of alarming danger. Each of them had provided a proper pair of scissors for the purpose. It is impossible to describe the exact of joy, which the sisters and the parents expressed upon this happy occasion. They united in fervent thanksgivings to Providence for this wonderful deliverance from so dreadful a calamity.
But, it wasn’t just women’s hair that caught fire, as we see here.

To end on a slightly cheeky note, this young woman must have heard about the perils of setting your clothes alight and wasn’t prepared to take any chances!

* It appears highly likely that Miss Wedderburn was Miss Susanna Wedderburn, the daughter of Sir John Wedderburn of Blackness, a Perthshire gentleman who joined the 1745 rebellion of Charles Edward Stuart and, captured at the Battle of Culloden, was afterwards hanged as a traitor; there is a burial date of the 18th September 1776 in Dundee for a Susanna Wedderburn.
Sources Used
The Athenaeum: A Magazine of Literary and Miscellaneous …, Volume 5
Annual Register, Volume 21
The Peerage.com
I suspect fire then was the equivalent of RTAs nowadays….
LikeLiked by 1 person
“She expired in a few hours” – What a ghastly epitaph! Considering all of the open flames and flammable fabrics, I’m amazed anyone survived the era at all. I wonder why we see so few incidences of burn victims mentioned in history & literature of this period? Surely not all of them died from their injuries? In any case, a very interesting article, ladies.
LikeLike
Yes, definitely a ghastly epitaph. Perhaps it wasn’t deemed a suitable subject for inclusion in literature who knows, but the newspapers actually published far more reports than we had expected to see and it wasn’t just restricted to women, there are reports of men having their wigs set on fire too, usually by getting too close to a candle whilst reading etc. The volume of reports does seem to diminish somewhat in the early 1800’s, perhaps the changes in fashion could have been the reason or possibly some lessons were learnt??
LikeLike
Reblogged this on First Night History.
LikeLike
I wonder? In some ways the fabrics we wear today can be even worse – imagine nylon burning and clinging. I suppose we have fewer open fires though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Merkwaardig (week 29) | www.weyerman.nl
Fascinating article, thanks!
The section on “how to cope in such an event” is vague about whether or not the woman’s hair actually caught fire (“the flame instantly blazed above, her head”) and describes only how she was saved from her burning clothes.
However, it seems fair to assume that “high heads” were especially hazardous because, unlike gowns, such enormous headgear had to be firmly anchored to the head and thus couldn’t be quickly discarded should they catch fire.
Just such an accident is depicted in the 2008 movie, “The Duchess” — a real “bodice-ripper” of a biography about Georgiana Spencer — although our heroine sports, at best, a “medium heads” look.
And while I couldn’t find a that scene online, I did find a clip from “The Making of ‘The Duchess'” clip in which actress Keira Knightley describes what wearing “high heads” felt like:
Thanks again for the informative post.
LikeLike
We’re delighted that you found it interesting. You’re quite correct the newspaper article of 1809 didn’t explain whether her hair was actually burnt & if so, how it was extinguished. By 1809 the ‘high hair’ was far less fashionable, so perhaps they had learnt some lessons by then!
Thank you for sharing the clip from ‘The Making of ‘The Duchess’. Like you we were unable access the part of the film showing the hair actually being set alight, so have added in an image of it to the post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, Polly, you dozy, old fussock … “high HAIR,” not “high heads”!
Thank you for the clip and bless you for your tact.
LikeLiked by 1 person
P.S. The clip to which I refer starts at 2:08.
LikeLike
Pingback: History Carnival 148 | William Savage: Pen and Pension
Pingback: Historical Fashion: Georgian Women’s Hairstyles – just history posts
Pingback: Historical Makeup Trends We All Love - Medicine and Makeup
Pingback: 9 Times People Literally DIED For Fashion - yowBuzz
Pingback: 9 Times People Were Actually Murdered By Their Clothes – My blog
Pingback: おしゃれが原因で死んじゃう人もいた。過酷な歴史のお話 – ViralPace